FREE MAN
Rapper includes at “shot out” to his lawyers, the Sheppards
Categories:
Recent Posts
- Defedant Not Guilty of Criminal Damage to Property arising out of Wrigleyville Bar Fight
- Defendant Not Guilty of DUI Alcohol on Theory that Defendnat Could Have Been Under the Influence of Cannabis, Not Alcohol
- Statutory Summary Suspension Rescinded, Motion to Quash Arrest and Suppres Evidence granted, and DUI case dismissed
- DuPage County: Following Motion to Suppress, Felony Disorderly Conduct Dismissed and Felony Gun Offense Reduced to Misdemeanor; Client Saved from Immigration Consequences
- Probation on over 75 pounds of Cannabis; class x charges reduced on eve of motions challenging the search warrant
- “Not-Guilty” of Battery of Cocktail Waitress: Rebuffed Sexual Advances Did Not Rise to the Level of Crime
- Initial Finding of Mental Unfitness Reversed and Aggravated Domestic Battery Charges Dismissed
- Sheppard and Associates is currently defending their client against the federal conspiracy charges described in the news articles below
- Defendant “Not-Guilty” of Attempt Murder of Ex-Gilfriend
- Defendants found “Not-Guilty” of Stabbing Outside of V-Live Nightclub
Categories
Resource Links
- Adam Sheppard's Article on Front Page re: Criminal Investigations of Students
- Adam Sheppard's article on the Constitutionality of Police Roadblocks published in the Decalogue Newsletter (August 09), click on links for pages 1-3 and then scroll down to page 10
- Arizona v. Gant: Search of Vehicles Incident to Arrest
- Barry Sheppard defends man accused of throwing dog out of third-story window
- Book on NBA Players and Crime discusses Barry Sheppard's representation of former NBA player
- DOJ Press Release regarding Mortgage Fraud case in which Sheppards are defending a Lead Defendant – the matter is set for trial in the winter.
- In United v. Tr—-X, a case in U.S. District Court in Camden, New Jersey, Barry Sheppard & Associates obtains dismissal of charges for man charged in international conspiracy to import counterfeit cigarettes
- MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. MASSACHUSETTS: To satisfy the Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the prosecution must produce forensic analysts for cross-examination at trial